Comments on: iMac and Mac mini Benchmarks (Early 2009)

By: sfdhdfghdfg

sfdhdfghdfg — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:13:55 +0000

Boutique selling "clothing, shoes, bags and the like are expensive, but a narrow range. But here, he did not expensive, but also a wide range. considering you only have about 3 seconds to get it right
Christmas factory outlets.
Buy now proposed a "Christmas gift '. A rare opportunity, what are you waiting for? Quickly move your mouse bar.
Activities As of December 26 http://www.nowbuyy.com

Now channel your inner puffy paint-lover and let those creative juices flow!

For more DIY, check out our crafty column.

By: itjobs1

itjobs1 — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:22:45 +0000

don't know how you got your results, the new softwares of Apple are making these new iterations rock. A lot of blogs said the Mac Mini is not up to par in terms of performance, I believe they have not use it before.
www.staffingpower.com

By: cubeover

cubeover — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:28 +0000

Please post the new fall'09 iMac benchmarks!
I got caught in Apple Store trying to run them, and I could not finish the test...

By: cubeover

cubeover — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:28 +0000

Please post the new fall'09 iMac benchmarks!
I got caught in Apple Store trying to run them, and I could not finish the test...

By: modeller miles

modeller miles — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:03:18 +0000

I think it gonna buy Mac Mini 2.0 to use wit Final cut studio and Adobe After effect and for log in to VR world Second life also.
It can handle this ?

By: Paul Guy

Paul Guy — Tue, 05 May 2009 02:01:39 +0000

I agree with anon about how there really isn't very much difference between the '08 and '09 iMacs, except for the fact that they can take more RAM now!

I own a 2008 2.66GHz 20inch iMac and am perfectly content with its RAM maxed out at 4GB, also the fact that it has dedicated graphics memory to boot, unlike the 2009 20inch model.

However, I do question Apple's decision to equip the 2.66GHz 24inch model with the same nVIDIa Graphics chip, when I think they would have been wiser putting that card in the 20inch model only.

20inch models with Shared graphics/24inch models with Dedicated graphics is what I had in mind!

By: Sigivald

Sigivald — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:07:51 +0000

Jason: The 2.2ghz one supports VT, and is still cheaper than an iMac.

(That said, the choice of the P7350 is still disappointing. Would a P7450 have killed them?)

By: williewonka

williewonka — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:23:47 +0000

I just got my own Mac mini 2.26, 4gb, 320 HD

It scored 3058 on geekbench

By: Stefan

Stefan — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:22:47 +0000

Did anyone already test the dual screen capabilities of the new minis? I am considering to use two 24" monitors over DVI and would even like to use the latest 23" 16:9 panels (2048*1152) which goes beyond the specification...

Any reports on dual screen capabilities and stability are very welcome!

Regards Stefan

By: prognostic

prognostic — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:15:28 +0000

Just to let everyone know. I got the new MacMini monday and the first thing I did was throw on Windows (using bootcamp). It scores a 5.2 in Windows experience. In comparison, I got a Dell Studio Slim Desktop a week ago that is fully upgraded which scores a 4.1 in Experience. Haven't ran any other benchmarks. I plan on putting an Intel X25M SSD in it soon.

The Mini is seriously a little beast, especially if you're looking for a secondary box. The upgraded ram to 4gb and 256mb nVidia gfx chipset makes all the diff in the world.