<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacBook Performance (May 2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:13:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take a look at the MacBook Pro results from April&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/04/geekbench-comparison-april-2007/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Geekbench Comparison&lt;/a&gt;; in particular, the entry-level MacBook Pro has an overall Geekbench score of 2825, while the high-end MacBook (from this article) has a Geekbench score of 2841.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; class=&quot;inline-foot&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-name&quot;&gt;MacBook&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;benchmark-desc&quot;&gt;Intel Core 2 Duo  @ 2.16GHz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-score&quot;&gt;2825&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-graph&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;benchmark-bar&quot; style=&quot;width:56%&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-name&quot;&gt;MacBook&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;benchmark-desc&quot;&gt;Intel Core 2 Duo  @ 2.16GHz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-score&quot;&gt;2841&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;benchmark-graph&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;alt benchmark-bar&quot; style=&quot;width:56%&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So really, there&#039;s not a lot of difference between the MacBook and the MacBook Pro when it comes to processor performance (which isn&#039;t surprising, considering both use the same kind of processor and the same kind of memory). &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian,</p>
<p>Take a look at the MacBook Pro results from April&#8217;s <a href="http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/04/geekbench-comparison-april-2007/" rel="nofollow">Geekbench Comparison</a>; in particular, the entry-level MacBook Pro has an overall Geekbench score of 2825, while the high-end MacBook (from this article) has a Geekbench score of 2841.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" class="inline-foot">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="benchmark-name">MacBook<br /><span class="benchmark-desc">Intel Core 2 Duo  @ 2.16GHz</span></td>
<td class="benchmark-score">2825</td>
<td class="benchmark-graph">
<div class="benchmark-bar" style="width:56%">&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<td class="benchmark-name">MacBook<br /><span class="benchmark-desc">Intel Core 2 Duo  @ 2.16GHz</span></td>
<td class="benchmark-score">2841</td>
<td class="benchmark-graph">
<div class="alt benchmark-bar" style="width:56%">&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So really, there&#8217;s not a lot of difference between the MacBook and the MacBook Pro when it comes to processor performance (which isn&#8217;t surprising, considering both use the same kind of processor and the same kind of memory). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi John,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there any chance you could do a compare btw the Macbook 2.16Ghz  and the entry level MacBook Pro. It would be interesting to see if the extra cash is worthwhile purely on a performace perspective. (ignoring screen size, case etc)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ian&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Is there any chance you could do a compare btw the Macbook 2.16Ghz  and the entry level MacBook Pro. It would be interesting to see if the extra cash is worthwhile purely on a performace perspective. (ignoring screen size, case etc)</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chris,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately &lt;code&gt;sysctl hw.model&lt;/code&gt; returns MacBook2,1 for both revisions, so it&#039;s hard to distinguish programatically between the new MacBooks and the old MacBooks.  If there&#039;s another mechanism for determine which revision a particular Mac is I&#039;d love to hear it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Unfortunately <code>sysctl hw.model</code> returns MacBook2,1 for both revisions, so it&#8217;s hard to distinguish programatically between the new MacBooks and the old MacBooks.  If there&#8217;s another mechanism for determine which revision a particular Mac is I&#8217;d love to hear it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The revised MacBooks are distinguished as MacBook (13-inch Mid 2007)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revised MacBooks are distinguished as MacBook (13-inch Mid 2007)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You forget to mention the new MacBooks come with 8x SuperDrives now, instead of 6x.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forget to mention the new MacBooks come with 8x SuperDrives now, instead of 6x.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 06:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ted,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s confusing because it is confusing.  Unfortunately the latest MacBooks identify themselves as &quot;MacBook (Late 2006)&quot;, so there&#039;s no way to distinguish between the latest revision and the previous revision.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s confusing because it is confusing.  Unfortunately the latest MacBooks identify themselves as &#8220;MacBook (Late 2006)&#8221;, so there&#8217;s no way to distinguish between the latest revision and the previous revision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 05:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/05/macbook-performance-may-2007/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have all three MacBooks listed as &quot;Late 2006&quot;. That&#039;s confusing, unless I&#039;m confused. A better comparison would be to compare two laptops of the same processor speed against each other. Of course a faster processor of the same family is going to have better performance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have all three MacBooks listed as &#8220;Late 2006&#8243;. That&#8217;s confusing, unless I&#8217;m confused. A better comparison would be to compare two laptops of the same processor speed against each other. Of course a faster processor of the same family is going to have better performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
